A tech enthusiast and writer with over a decade of experience in digital innovation and startup ecosystems.
Thirty women had taken refuge in a maternity hospital in El Fasher, Sudan, when the massacre started. Several had recently given birth, while others were actively in labor.
Present at the hospital after dark, a 28-year-old lab technician, Abdo-Rabo Ahmed, managed to survive the ordeal. “I heard the screams of women and children,” he explains. “They were killing everyone inside the hospital. Survival meant running for your life.”
This horrifying event stands as one of the most shocking examples in the two-year civil war tearing the North African nation apart. Militiamen forced their way into the building, reportedly killing more than 460 individuals receiving care and their families.
Rights organizations have labeled it “an unspeakable atrocity,” and a prime example of the vanishing safeguards for civilians caught in conflict zones in Ukraine, Gaza, Myanmar, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Sudan.
While all major powers have agreed to the Geneva conventions, which commit them to defending civilians, the past year has experienced a historic high of violence targeting health services. Expectant mothers are particularly at risk due to their need for locally available medical care.
Data analysis and investigations uncover an unprecedented scale of attacks: nearly 300 violent acts against maternity care facilities, staff, and pregnant women over the last three years, including at least 119 targeted attacks against hospitals and delivery wards.
“These incidents do not represent standard wartime hazards. They constitute a deliberate strategy of violence against reproduction.”
The majority of these incidents have happened in regions embroiled in intense conflict, where countless of pregnant women are trapped.
Deaths have occurred, prevented from accessing care, or made to have their babies in dangerous and unsanitary conditions. The data also indicates that at least 68 maternal health workers have been slain, 15 kidnapped, and 101 arrested—sometimes during medical procedures.
Statistics are thought to be a grave undercount, as they capture solely incidents covered by the media. In many war-torn areas, communications are sparse.
Last year, it was reported that half of all women who lost their lives in maternal circumstances were in a conflict area. This underscores a catastrophic reality.
Beyond killing women and staff, these attacks are destroying critical infrastructure for mothers and babies, posing a long-term threat to community survival.
In Gaza, the devastating effect on the right to maternal care has been cited by a UN commission as a factor in accusations of genocidal acts.
Despite periods of calm, doctors report that women and children continue to die from medical shortages, owing to desperate lacks of medicine and equipment. Agencies have reported women giving birth in rubble because hospitals were out of reach.
“Direct shelling targeting the wards, operating rooms, and maternity wards,” explains the head of a major hospital’s gynecology department. A military spokesperson has contested deliberately targeting maternity care or seeking to affect birthrates.
Since early 2022, at least 80 hospitals for mothers and babies have been attacked and rendered unusable in Ukraine. Accounts from embattled medical centers describe births taking place in basements and skyrocketing stress leading to birth complications.
“We are being singled out,” claims the head of obstetrics at a repeatedly damaged hospital in Kherson. The government has disputed deliberately targeting civilians.
“The reality is, every facility can be under attack now,” comments a medical director in Sumy. “When defensive systems shoot down an aircraft, the falling debris could impact a hospital.”
For the more than 676 million women living near active conflicts, there are minimal protections and rare trials for atrocities for those attacking childbirth services.
This lack of accountability has fostered a “culture of impunity,” argues a human rights lawyer. “Assaults against maternal services, like forced pregnancy or forced sterilisation, are potentially acts of genocide by destroying a group's future.”
In El Fasher, the area had been cut off from humanitarian aid long before the hospital attack, with malnutrition spiking dangerously, especially among children and pregnant women.
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, information is scarce because of a lack of access from rebel-held areas. Nevertheless, shelling in Goma damaged a maternity hospital, causing fatalities among patients and staff.
In Myanmar, clinics have been attacked and dozens of midwives and patients have been arrested, killed, or injured over the past two years of civil war.
A large proportion of mother deaths are averted with basic healthcare, but war shatters health systems. Rights groups note that fear is now driving women away from facilities once considered safe, leading them to risky home births lacking professional help.
“When childbirth centers become intentional targets speaks to a larger and alarming strategy: the use of violence against hospitals as a tool for terror and to destroy community bonds,” observes a legal researcher.
“There is no absolute protection for hospitals in war. Under the Geneva conventions, medical facilities are not inviolable if used for acts deemed ‘harmful to the enemy’, which has now become a standard defence.”
A tech enthusiast and writer with over a decade of experience in digital innovation and startup ecosystems.